Skip to main content

This link is exclusively for students and staff members within this organisation.

Unauthorised use will lead to account termination.

Previous

From quantitative easing to quantitative tightening

Next

Interview: An apprenticeship in economics

FISCAL POLICY

The economics of a universal basic income

As economic shocks become more frequent, some commentators have suggested the current working-age benefit system is no longer fit for purpose. Instead, they have advocated perhaps the simplest imaginable welfare system – a universal basic income. Matthew Oulton considers the implications

Aerial view of busy pedestrian crossing.
© Dmyro/stock.adobe.com

The single biggest expense in the UK government’s budget – more than spending on health, education and defence – is social security. In 2024–25 the state will spend over 10% of GDP on social security payments, which take money from taxpayers in general and give it to specific groups of individuals. Just under half of these payments are made to working-age individuals and children, while the rest are for pensioners.

These transfers are intended for a range of purposes – insuring us against risks like job loss or illness, alleviating poverty and incentivising activities the government wants to encourage like looking for work.

Your organisation does not have access to this article.

Sign up today to give your students the edge they need to achieve their best grades with subject expertise

Subscribe

Previous

From quantitative easing to quantitative tightening

Next

Interview: An apprenticeship in economics

Related articles: